![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]()
Contact Us
|
Wrongful Death Against United States Settles Following Plaintiff's Successful Pretrial Motion By William S. Bailey I. SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS CASE OF INTEREST TO TRIAL NEWS READERS 1. Court grants partial summary judgment on liability, finding uncontroverted evidence of failure of the U.S. Department of Energy to enforce safety procedures. 2. DOE's failure to enforce safety procedures constitutes a breach of duty to provide a safe workplace. 3. Enforcement of safety regulations by DOE does not involve the discretionary function exception. 4. DOE's report of investigation following decedent's accident is admissible under ER 803(8) and is not a subsequent remedial measure under ER 407. 5. The United States is not entitled to subtract any portion of negligence attributable to an immune entity such as decedent's employer in reducing the net award to decedent. A wrongful death case against the U.S. Department of Energy on behalf of the wife and children of Louis O. Beatty settled recently for $1,500,000, following a series of rulings by the Honorable Justin L. To the credit of Energy Secretary Hazel O'Leary, a major investigation into the circumstances of Mr. Beatty's death followed. The U.S. Department of Energy convened a “Type A” Accident Investigation Board, made up of high level DOE officials as well as working men and women who were directly involved in the daily operation of Hanford. The final report of the Board was quite critical of both the Department of Energy's and Westinghouse Hanford Corporation's safety practices at Hanford . The Board determined that Mr. Beatty's death was due in substantial part to both DOE's and Westinghouse's failure to: 1. Enforce existing safety procedures; |
|||
Disclaimer | Sitemap | Contact Us | 2008 All Rights Reserved | Site Developed by Catherine Flemming | Designed by Suryn Longbotham |